On September 8, the U.S. Circuit of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in a unanimous decision, ruled that “contrary to the BIA’s interpretation in Matter of Wang, the benefits of 8 U.S.C. section 1153(h)(3) unambiguously apply to all petitions described in section 1153(h)(2)…”
Websites and Facebook
Search
Categories
- 14th Amendment (53)
- 287(g) (13)
- Agjobs (10)
- Alabama HB56 (4)
- Arizona SB 1070 (51)
- Asylum (24)
- Birthright Citizenship (54)
- Border Patrol (46)
- CAP - Criminal Alien Program (7)
- Central Texas (55)
- Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) (2)
- CIR (14)
- Crime Victim (19)
- Criminal law (123)
- Current Affairs (9)
- Deferred Action (79)
- Deportation (282)
- Detention (135)
- DREAM Act (189)
- Driver's Licenses (36)
- E-Verify (7)
- Family Immigration (2)
- I.C.E. (216)
- Immigration law (935)
- Investor Visa (1)
- Mexico (155)
- Military (4)
- Naturalization (9)
- Obama Administration (159)
- Prosecutorial Discretion (40)
- Refugees (1)
- Sanctuary Cities (41)
- Secure Communities (101)
- Texas (487)
- Trump (4)
- Trump Administration (4)
- U.S. Supreme Court (14)
- Unaccompanied Children (5)
- Unemployment (8)
- Visa Bulletin (40)
- Waiver (13)
« Immigration Prosecutorial Discretion Policy Hasn't Trickled Down to Border Patrol | Main | Prosecutorial Discretion not exercised in San Antonio Immigration Court »
09/09/2011
The comments to this entry are closed.
Blogs I Follow
- Texas Criminal Law
Waco criminal lawyer, Walter M. Reaves, Jr., blogs on criminal law (sometimes overlapping with immigration law).
Comments