Texas Immigration Lawyer Blog

Is This Alabama? Anti-Immigration bill consequences

Is This Alabama? 

In June 2011 Alabama enacted H.B. 56—the most extreme state-level anti-immigrant bill passed to date—which went into effect in September. Now Hollywood director Chris Weitz has turned the camera on Alabama and is asking “Is This Alabama?”

You be the judge. Watch and share the videos below.

Watch a replay of the “Is This Alabama?” launch event with director Chris Weitz and Jose Antonio Vargas at the Center for American Progress.

 

 

The Two Faces of Alabama

What Alabama Knows About Civil Rights

“Not the Kind of Alabama I Want”

An Alabama Mother Speaks

 

“Is This Alabama” is a project of:

 

University of Texas Law School to Host Panel Discussion on State Anti-Immigrant Laws

A panel discussion entitled “Cutting Edge Issues in Immigration Law: State Anti-Immigrant Statutes and Litigation” will be held at the Law School on Monday, February 13, 2012, from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm in the Sheffield Room.  The Law School’s William Wayne Justice Center for Public Interest Law and the Immigration and Nationality Section of the State Bar of Texas are cosponsoring the event.   

Professor Barbara Hines, co-director of the Law School’s Immigration Clinic, will moderate discussion by two nationally known attorneys who are involved in current challenges to state anti-immigrant statutes, Nina Perales, Director of Litigation at MALDEF, and Sam Brooke, staff attorney with the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Immigrant Justice Project.  

Perales is a leading civil rights litigator and an expert on a range of issues, including immigrants’ rights, voting rights, and redistricting litigation. Among her current cases, she recently successfully argued in the lawsuit challenging Arizona’s anti-immigrant law known as SB 1070. She also leads the litigation that has struck down repeated anti-immigrant laws in Farmers Branch, Texas.  Brooke is litigating state anti-immigrant laws throughout the Southeast, including Alabama’s HB56, Georgia’s HB87, and South Carolina’s SB20.  

The event will include two sessions.  The first session, from 11:30 am - 12:30 pm, will explore the current wave of state anti-immigrant laws.  The second session, from 12:30 - 1:30 pm, will examine legal strategies in several pending cases challenging state anti-immigrant laws.  Audience members may attend one or both sessions.

The State Bar of Texas has accredited this event for 2 hours of continuing legal education.  The event is free and open to students, the law school community, and the public, but space is limited.

Please RSVP to Rachel Sidopulos, [email protected], by February 8 to register and reserve box lunch. 

Contact: Mary Crouter, assistant director of the William Wayne Justice Center for Public Interest Law, UT Law, 512-232-7855, [email protected]

This American Life: Reap What You Sow looks at Alabama's anti-immigrant law

This weekend on This American Life: Reap What You Sow, an episode examining Alabama's anti-immigrant law.

 

Alabama's new immigration law aims to make life so difficult for [undocumented] immigrants that they will "self-deport." And in a way it's working. Immigrants are fleeing Alabama...but not just the [undocumented] ones. And now some lawmakers are scrambling to reform the law they voted for. This and other stories of people living with the unintended consequences of their decisions.        

 

Real stories from Alabama in wake of its harsh anti-immigrant law

SLPC, By Mary Bauer, Legal Director, Southern Poverty Law Center. Testimony given in Birmingham, Ala. in the Birmingham City Council Chambers.

The Real World Effects of this Law

After HB56 went into effect, SPLC and the other groups representing plaintiffs in HICA v. Bentley started a telephone hotline to field calls about the law. In the first weekend, we received close to 1,000 calls. We have now received close to 4,000 calls through the hotline, and we’ve received many other complaints through other means, including through know your rights presentations we have conducted around the state. The breadth of the problems—created directly and indirectly by the law,—is breathtaking. A small sample of the kinds of concerns people have raised follows:

• A mother in northern Alabama was told she could not attend a book fair at her daughter’s school without an Alabama state ID or driver’s license.
• A father called to report that his U.S. citizen daughter came home weeping from school after other students told her she did not belong there and needed to go back to Mexico—a country she had never visited.
• A judge advised a lawyer that the lawyer had obligation to report her own client to ICE as undocumented. The same judge stated that he might have to report to ICE any person who asked for an interpreter, as such a request would be a red flag.
• Latino workers on a construction jobsite were threatened by a group of men with guns, who told them to go back to Mexico and threatened to kill them if they were there the following day. They declined to report the crime to law enforcement because of fears of what would happen to them if they did.
• A clerk at a store in Bessemar told a Latino man (lawfully in the United States) from Ohio that he could not make a purchase with his bank card because he did not have an Alabama state issued identification or driver’s license.
• A victim of domestic violence went to court to obtain a protective order. The clerk told her that she’d be reported to ICE if she proceeded.
• A local bar association has advised its lawyers that if they are asked to report information about their undocumented clients to law enforcement, the requirements of HB56 will override the legal obligation to preserve a client’s confidences.
• By the first Monday after HB56 was allowed to take effect, 2,285 Latino students were absent from schools across Alabama; 7 percent of the total Latino school population. Since then, the Attorney General and the state have refused to share enrollment and absentee data to anyone, including the United States Department of Justice.
• A public school in Montgomery asked already enrolled Latino students questions about their immigration status and that of their parents. As a result, some parents are keeping their children out of school.
• In Allgood, the water authority posted a sign indicating that water customers would have to produce identification documents proving immigration status in order to maintain water service.
• In Northport, the water authority provided notices to Latino customers that their services will be shut off if they didn’t provide proof of immigration status immediately.
• In Madison County and in Decatur, the public utilities have announced that they will not provide water, gas, or sewage service to people who could not prove their status.
• Numerous probate offices, including the Montgomery Probate Office and the Houston County Probate Office, have published notices indicating that they will not provide any services to anyone without proof of immigration status. As a result, many immigrants cannot request birth or death certificates.
• An apartment complex manager in Hoover told residents they would not be able to renew their leases without proof of immigration status.
• Legal immigrants, including those with temporary protected status, have been told that they cannot obtain drivers’ licenses in the state.
• A worker called to say that his employer refused to pay him, citing HB56, and stated that the worker had no rights to be paid under this law.
• A mother spoke to the local office of the Department of Human Resources about her U.S. citizen children’s eligibility for food stamps. The social worker told the mother that she would be turning the mother into the federal government for deportation. The family went into hiding.
• Alabama Power told a family that they would not be able to have their electricity reconnected without providing proof of immigration status. That family left the state.
• A husband called us to report that his wife, nine months pregnant, was too afraid to go to a hospital in Alabama to give birth, and that he was trying to decide whether to have her give birth at home or somehow to try to get to Florida.
• A Latino man was arrested and detained. While in jail, he was told that he could not use the telephone to call his attorney because the use of the phone would be a “business transaction” prohibited by HB56.

Need for Government Action

HB 56 has created a humanitarian disaster in this state. We have been heartened by the interest in our state by the Members of Congress who have traveled to Alabama for this hearing, by the United States Department of Justice, and by other federal agencies. But much more needs to be done. Most importantly, we need action by the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. We were pleased to read that Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano has stated that DHS will not help Alabama implement this law, but we have yet to hear specifics about what that will mean in the real world. In the meantime, it appears to us on the ground that it is “business as usual” for ICE in Alabama. We have received calls from dozens of individuals whose family members have been arrested as a result of this law. People who are arrested pursuant to this law are being detained and put into removal proceedings. That needs to stop.

The Rights Working Group, of which we are a member, sent a letter to Secretary Napolitano earlier this month asking that DHS take concrete steps to ensure that it does not, wittingly or not, assist Alabama in implementing this law. SPLC followed up on that letter with its own request, and we also sought a meeting with the Secretary to discuss the crisis in Alabama. I have attached copies of both letters to this testimony. We are still hopeful that that meeting will happen, but we have yet to receive a response to our request. The people of Alabama need assurance that the federal government will not further acquiesce in or enable this terrible law.

Conclusion

Alabama is suffering a humanitarian crisis, a crisis that hearkens this state back to the bleakest days of our racial history.

Thank you again for the opportunity to testify. I welcome your questions.